Maybe it’s figured out a way to really distinguish the Mac Pro from the Mac Studio. We’ll have to see if this turns out to be true.įor all we know, Apple very well may have some kind of brand new solution in the works. If that’s true, Apple may try to time it with the launch of the M3 chips. Mark Gurman is the reporter on many of these rumors, and he still believes a Mac Pro update is coming later this year. The company has clearly painted itself into a corner, and it might be smarter now to just bow out now. But come on, that’s not a sustainable solution - especially not for a company that thinks out its product lineups like Apple does. Given how much cheaper and smaller the Mac Studio is, what possible reason would there be to buy the Mac Pro?Īpple’s plan seems to be to skip an update to the Mac Studio to avoid cannibalization in its own lineup. As you can probably imagine, that leaves very little difference between these two desktops. That would be, as it sounds, the successor to the same chip that debuted in the Mac Studio. All the while, Apple executives continued to commit to the idea that the Apple Silicon Mac Pro was coming.Īnd now, word on the street is that the new Mac Pro will use an M2 Ultra. Some reports indicated that sort of M1 Extreme was being engineered, but as the delays mounted, it became clear that such a chip wasn’t making the cut after all. At the time, we all took that to mean Apple had some kind of more powerful chip in the works, which became known in the rumor mill as the M1 Extreme. The result was incredible performance, especially on the graphics front, with up to 64 GPU cores.ĭespite that fact, Apple insisted at that very same event that the Mac Pro was, indeed, still in the works. The M1 Ultra was made by stitching together two sides of the M1 Max die, packaged using the company’s UltraFusion technology. With it, the M1 Ultra, the most powerful configuration of the M1 we’d ever seen, made its debut. The elephant in the roomĪpple announced the Mac Studio last spring, and the brand new desktop in the lineup certainly felt like a proper replacement of both the 27-inch iMac and the Mac Pro. Without this kind of modularity, one of the primary selling points of the Mac Pro is out the window - and the very idea already has Pro users frustrated.Īll that’s left, in this case, is better performance. While storage would still be able to be upgraded, by the logic of the design of Apple Silicon, it’s hard to imagine how memory could be upgradeable. Now you’ll receive all of the iMessages sent to your phone number on your Mac.And according to the latest reports, Apple’s plan was to use an Apple Silicon chip in an updated Mac Pro, while removing the ability to upgrade graphics. You’ve added your phone number for iMessage on your Mac. Click the checkbox next to your phone number to use it for iMessage on your Mac. You should see your phone number in the middle of the window. Make sure that you’re signed in to iCloud and have the Enable Messages in iCloud checkbox selected. On your Mac, open the Messages application.įrom the Messages menu, select Preferences.Ĭlick the iMessage tab. Here’s how to use your phone number for iMessage on your Mac: Verify that your phone number has a check mark next to it - if it doesn’t, tap it to enable it for iMessage. Make sure that the iMessage switch is turned on, as shown below. After you add your phone number, you’ll receive all iMessages sent to your phone number on your Mac.įirst, check that your phone number is enabled for iMessage on your iPhone:įrom the home screen on your iPhone, tap Settings. You can add your phone number to the Messages application on your Mac to send and receive iMessages using your phone number. IMessage is Apple’s end-to-end encrypted instant messaging service that you can use to send text messages, photos, and more to other people who own Apple devices. How to Use Your Phone Number for iMessage on Your Mac.AirPort Apple Apps Backups Developer Education Email Hardware Internet iPad iPhone Mac Music Network Photos Security TV Weekend Wonk
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |